Skip to content
Farrington LawFarrington Law
Farrington Law
Labor & Employment Law
  • Home
  • Firm Profile
  • Our Team
  • Services
  • News & Opinion
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Firm Profile
  • Our Team
  • Services
  • News & Opinion
  • Careers
  • Contact

Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro and a New Approach to FLSA Exemptions

Mechanic in auto repair shop works with customer

 By: Sherron Thomas McClain

In Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, decided on April 2, 2018, the United States Supreme Court held that service advisors at a California car dealership are exempt from the overtime pay requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §231(b)(10)(A).  In a more far-reaching pronouncement, the Court also held that FLSA exemptions would no longer be narrowly construed against employers seeking to use them.

Under the FLSA, “any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles” is exempt from the statute’s requirements.  In the Encino opinion, authored by Justice Thomas, the Court held that a service advisor “is obviously a ‘salesman’” because they “‘sell [customers] services for their vehicles’” and “are integrally involved in the servicing process.”  It is irrelevant that the service advisors do not physically repair automobiles themselves for purposes of the exemption.

More significantly, the Court rejected the principle that exemptions to the FLSA should be construed narrowly.  Because the FLSA gives no indication that exemptions should be construed narrowly, and features more than two dozen exemptions in Section 213(b) alone, the Court held that exemptions should receive “a fair reading” instead of the more restrictive “narrow” interpretation.  The dissent noted that in a single paragraph the majority rejected the longstanding principle without acknowledging that doing so “unsettles more than half a century of our precedent.”

While it is difficult to accurately predict the practical impact of any court decision, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Encino is a positive development for employers arguing in favor of an FLSA exemption which may now be examined under the less restrictive “fair reading” standard.

Category: Latest NewsBy Farrington LawApril 9, 2018

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Farrington Law and Dan Farrington Recognized in Chambers USA 2018NextNext post:New DOL PAID Program: Correct Wage and Hour Violations of the FLSA, Avoid Litigation

Related posts

Photo of Daniel E. Farrington
Dan Farrington Recognized in 2019 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America©
August 15, 2018
Sexual Harassment Complaint Form
EEOC Focuses on Sexual Harassment Claims
June 26, 2018
Picture of a person's hand holding a pen, about to sign an agreement
Maryland’s New Sexual Harassment Disclosure Law Ends Mandatory Arbitration?
May 23, 2018
Farrington Law - Chambers USA 2018 Logo
Farrington Law and Dan Farrington Recognized in Chambers USA 2018
May 3, 2018
Keyboard with key for payroll
New DOL PAID Program: Correct Wage and Hour Violations of the FLSA, Avoid Litigation
April 2, 2018
Can Employers Ask About Salary History?
March 19, 2018
Recent Posts
  • Photo of Daniel E. Farrington
    Dan Farrington Recognized in 2019 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America©
    August 15, 2018
  • Sexual Harassment Complaint Form
    EEOC Focuses on Sexual Harassment Claims
    June 26, 2018
  • Picture of a person's hand holding a pen, about to sign an agreement
    Maryland’s New Sexual Harassment Disclosure Law Ends Mandatory Arbitration?
    May 23, 2018
  • Farrington Law - Chambers USA 2018 Logo
    Farrington Law and Dan Farrington Recognized in Chambers USA 2018
    May 3, 2018
Contact Us
  • Office:
    7501 Wisconsin Avenue
    Suite 1220 West
    Bethesda, Maryland 20814
  • Phone:
    (301) 880-5030
  • Fax:
    (301) 880-5031
  • Email:
    [email protected]

Find us on:

Linkedin
Our Services
  • Industries Represented

    Farrington Law represents employers in a wide variety of industries, including architecture and engineering, aviation, financial services, food services, government contracting, health care, pharmaceuticals, professional services, retail, technology, communications and nonprofits.

  • Counseling on Employment Law

    We believe that the best litigation strategy is often to avoid litigation. We work closely with our clients to avoid litigation by advising them on their obligations under common law and under federal statutes such as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans With Disabilities Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and a host of state and local employment laws. We help employers minimize the risk of employee and government lawsuits through careful compliance with these laws.

  • Litigation

    Sometimes, despite a company’s best efforts and ours, litigation can be unavoidable. We know the inside of a courtroom and we represent our clients efficiently, thoroughly and aggressively. We seek the quickest and most economical results for our clients, consistent with their strategic business goals.

Featured Posts
  • Photo of Daniel E. Farrington
    Dan Farrington Recognized in 2019 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America©
    August 15, 2018
  • Sexual Harassment Complaint Form
    EEOC Focuses on Sexual Harassment Claims
    June 26, 2018
  • Picture of a person's hand holding a pen, about to sign an agreement
    Maryland’s New Sexual Harassment Disclosure Law Ends Mandatory Arbitration?
    May 23, 2018
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use & Disclaimer
Footer Menu